Sunderland v. Bishop
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Commissioners’ Opinion, Division No. 3. Error from District Court. Tulsa County; Redmond S. Cole, Judge. Action by G. W. Bishop against J. W. Sun-derland et al. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUTH, C.
This action was instituted by defendaiit in error for injunction. ' and to quiet title to lands, claimed by plaintiffs 'in error, defendants below, under a' lease, and for convenience the parties- will be désignated as they appeared in the1 lower court;
Plaintiff’s petition alleges one Flossie Baker owned certain lands, and ‘on February 28, 1921, she leased the same to the plaintiff for a-period of one year beginning January 1, 1922, and the lease was duly recorded. ■ That during the year 1921, the plaintiff was in quiet, and undisputed possession of the premises as a tenant…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McHenry v. . JewettNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- O'Brien v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Marshall v. HomierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Harris v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bradley v. RenfrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Baker v. LloydSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Lewis v. HicksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Jennings v. ElliottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939