Legal Opinion

Harris v. Smiley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 19, 1912No. 1350PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error from District Court, McClain County; R. McMillan, Judge. Action by J. Smiley against R. Harris and others for injunction and damages. Judgment for plaintiff,, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bjr

ROBERTSON, C.

This was an action by J. Smiley, defendant in error,1 plaintiff below, against R. Harris, J. W. Lokey, and C. S. Beard, plaintiffs in error, defendants below, for an injunction and for damages. It appears from the íecord that one Isabel Anderson, a nonresident, was indebted to R. Harris, a merchant at Byars, and that J. Smiley was indebted to said Anderson on a promissory note, not yet due. Harris instituted a suit against Anderson, before Lokey, a justice of the peace at Byars, and procured a garnishment process to be served on Smiley. Smiley answered that he was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. LowderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  2. Sprague v. NorwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Crist v. CosbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Eastern Railway Co. v. HoerethSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  5. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HolladaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Black v. GeisslerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. Welch, Ins. Com'rSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Stumpff v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Dardenne v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API