Legal Opinion

Multi-Clean Products, Inc. v. Kasper

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 30, 1971No. 54807PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE LEIGHTON

delivered the opinion of the court:

This appeal is the outgrowth of a controversy concerning a certificate of deposit seized by a writ of attachment. The sole issue is whether the trial judge ruled correctly when he found that the certificate was owned by Ruth L. Kasper, the interpleader.

On August 5, 1968, a safe-deposit box jointly owned by Wayne J. Kasper, Ruth L. Kasper (husband and wife) and Judith L. Kasper (the daughter of Ruth by a former marriage), was seized by a writ of attachment. In the box (with two other items not here relevant) was a $10,000…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Spina v. SpinaIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Walker v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Mauricau v. HaugenIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Nickoloff v. NickoloffIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Hinshaw v. RussellIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of StinchcombSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. In Re Estate of CaseyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. Amdura National Distribution Co. v. Amdura Corp. (In Re Amdura Corp.)District Court, D. Colorado · 1994
  4. Finkelstein v. KissellColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. In Re Estate of FinkelsteinColorado Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API