Legal Opinion
Finkelstein v. Kissell
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided August 15, 1991No. 90CA0924PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge MARQUEZ.
Petitioner, Lola Underdown, appeals from a judgment of the probate court denying her claim to the contents of a safe deposit box, a box that she had leased with the decedent, Shirley Eva Finkelstein, under a written safe deposit box lease. The personal representative of the decedent’s estate, Walter E. Kissell, cross-appeals from the denial of his claim for damages and attorney fees. We affirm.
In the fall of 1988, the decedent, in her name alone, leased a safe deposit box from a Denver bank. On May 12, 1989, petitioner’s name was added to the lease agreement at issue…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- I.M.A., Inc. v. Rocky Mountain Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- California Trust Co. v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Younger v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Hartt v. BrimmerWyoming Supreme Court · 1955
- American Trust Co. v. FitzmauriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Patricia L. Buell v. Security General Life Insurance Company, an Oklahoma Corporation, and American Life and Casualty Insurance Company, an Iowa Corporation American Marketing Services, Inc., Formerly Known as Benecenter of Colorado, Inc., Doing Business as Benecenter of Colorado, Inc., an Arizona Corporation Benecenter of Colorado, Inc., a Colorado Corporation, Patricia L. Buell v. Security General Life Insurance Company, an Oklahoma Corporation American Life and Casualty Insurance Company, an Iowa Corporation American Marketing Services, Inc., Formerly Known as Benecenter of Colorado, Inc., Doing Business as Benecenter of Colorado, Inc., an Arizona Corporation Benecenter of Colorado, Inc., a Colorado CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- In Re Estate of FinkelsteinColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- Buell v. Security General Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993