Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Terteling
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided September 19, 1984No. 14835PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BISTLINE, Justice.
The present appeal is concerned with an option to purchase land executed between the owners of the land, Orville P. Brooks and his wife Elizabeth Brooks, and the holder of the option to purchase, N.L. Terteling.
The land in question is 2.82 acres of lakefront property located on the Payette Lake near McCall, Idaho. The trial court found on conflicting evidence that the option agreement was part of a single transaction involving the sale by the Brooks of an additional 24.18 acres which, together with the 2.82 acres under options, had originally comprised a single 27-acre…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stearns v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
- Werry v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Dale's Service Company, Inc. v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Scharbach v. Continental Casualty CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
- Brackett v. SchaferWashington Supreme Court · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lovey v. Régence BlueShield of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Smith v. Idaho State University Federal Credit UnionIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
- Hershey v. SimpsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
- Hershey v. SimpsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
- Brooks v. TertelingIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.