Legal Opinion

Hershey v. Simpson

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 1986No. 16091PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

The general issue in this appeal is whether a litigation settlement agreement should be enforced even though it may produce a harsh result in light of subsequent events. This issue embraces two specific questions: (1) Is the settlement agreement unconscionable? (2) Has the party seeking to enforce the agreement committed an antecedent breach? The district court refused relief on either ground and ordered the agreement to be specifically performed. For reasons explained below we vacate the district court’s order.

The facts essential to our opinion are undisputed. Carey and Sheryl…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hume v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Pope v. Intermountain Gas Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Graves v. CupicIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Goodman v. Newzona Investment Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lovey v. Régence BlueShield of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Walker v. American Cyanamid Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Smith v. Idaho State University Federal Credit UnionIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Culp v. Tri-County Tractor, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. KruegerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API