Legal Opinion

Hershey v. Simpson

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 1986No. 16091PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

725 P.2d 196 (1986)

111 Idaho 196

James R. HERSHEY and Edith L. Hershey, Plaintiffs-Respondents,

v.

Carey E. SIMPSON and Sheryl L. Simpson, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 16091.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

September 3, 1986.

Robert E. Kinney, of Orofino, for defendants-appellants.

Jeanette I. Thiel, Lewiston, for plaintiffs-respondents.

BURNETT, Judge.

The general issue in this appeal is whether a litigation settlement agreement should be enforced even though it may produce a harsh result in light of subsequent events. This issue embraces two specific questions: (1) Is the settlement agreement…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hume v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Pope v. Intermountain Gas Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Graves v. CupicIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Goodman v. Newzona Investment Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lovey v. Régence BlueShield of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Walker v. American Cyanamid Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Smith v. Idaho State University Federal Credit UnionIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Culp v. Tri-County Tractor, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. KruegerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API