Legal Opinion

People v. Platt

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 12, 2004No. 03SA217PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs

In this interlocutory appeal, pursuant to section 16-12-102(2), 6 C.R.S. (2002), and C.A.R. 4.1, the prosecution challenges an order of the Denver County District Court granting defendant Bruce Platt's motion to suppress his oral and written statements to the police. With regard to all three statements, the trial court ruled that, as a result of Platt's drug usage, he did not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waive his Miranda rights. We reverse the trial court's suppression order with regard to all of his statements to the police.

The trial court failed to evaluate the totality of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Colorado v. SpringSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. People v. MathenySupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  5. People v. HarlanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. MadridSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  3. People v. HumphreySupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  4. People v. HankinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  5. State v. Fernando-GranadosNebraska Supreme Court · 2004

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API