Legal Opinion

Botti v. Savill

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 13, 1929No. Docket No. 6591PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORTON, J., pro tem.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs to recover damages for death claimed to have been caused through the negligent operation of an automobile by the defendant.

The plaintiffs are the widow and minor children of Louis Botti, who was struck and killed by the defendant’s automobile while crossing the state highway in San Mateo County.

Defendant denied the alleged negligence and affirmatively charged the deceased with contributory negligence. The case was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of defendant. Motion for a new trial was made and denied, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Steinberger v. California Electric Garage Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Metcalfe v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Polk v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Stroud v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Creamer v. CerratoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Christy v. Herbert M. Baruch Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Ferner v. CasalegnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API