Metcalfe v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries. The plaintiffs are husband and wife and the injuries in question were suffered by the latter as the result of her automobile having stopped on certain car tracks in front of one of defendant’s electric inter urban trains and having been run down by the cars. Judgment went for defendant and plaintiffs appeal.
Among other things, appellants contend for a reversal of the judgment on the ground that the trial court erred in overruling their demurrer to a special defense contained in the answer and which alleges “that said plaintiffs did…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Robinson v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Strong v. Sacramento & Placerville RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Griswold v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Sinclair v. Pioneer Truck Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
- Tobin v. Omnibus Cable Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by14 opinions
- Polk v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Jolley v. ClemensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Freeman v. ChurchillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Groat v. Walkup Drayage & Warehouse Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Creamer v. CerratoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.