Legal Opinion

O'Neal v. Chicago & Indiana Coal Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1892No. 15,476PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Clay Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— 'The appellee moved for and was awarded a judgment upon the special verdict, and the question for decision is, whether the court did right in sustaining the motion. This question must be decided upon the facts stated in the verdict, excluding mere matters of evidence and conclusions. It is also to be borne in mind that, as the appellant had the burden of proof, the facts stated in the verdict must show a cause of action or this appeal can not be sustained, for it is well settled that defects in special verdicts can not be supplied by intendment, and that a party who has *111the burden can not…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Rogers v. LeydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Jenney Electric Light & Power Co. v. MurphyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. KemperIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Wabash Railroad v. RayIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. DuganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Peirce v. OliverIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API