Legal Opinion

Peirce v. Oliver

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1897No. 2,165PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, J. —

Appellee brought, this action to recover damages for a personal injury. The complaint *88is in one paragraph, and avers substantially that the predecessor of the appellant, receiver, employed one Earnst to have the care, repair, and inspection of bridges along the line of appellant railroad, and that he was authorized as bridge foreman to employ such bridge carpenters, helpers, and day laborers as might in his opinion be necessary to keep the bridges on the line of said road in repair; that said Earnst had the power and authority to employ, determine the compensation of, and to…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Brazil Block Coal Co. v. HoodletIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. DuelIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Board of Commissioners v. BonebrakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Ohio & Mississippi Railroad v. TindallIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hodges v. Standard Wheel Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. McCowen, Probst, Menaugh Co. v. ShortIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Patterson v. Southern Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Indianapolis Gas Co. v. ShumackIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. PressellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API