State ex rel. Grady v. State Employment Relations Board
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Standard of Review
Grady asserts in his propositions of law that the court of appeals erred in granting SERB’S summary judgment motion and denying the writ. Civ.R. 56(C) provides that before summary judgment may be granted, it must be determined that (1) no genuine issue as to any material fact remains to be litigated, (2) the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and (3) it appears from the evidence that reasonable minds can come to but one conclusion, and viewing such evidence most strongly in favor of the nonmoving party, that conclusion is adverse to the party against…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Mootispaw v. EcksteinOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Richard v. SeidnerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Ohio Ass'n of Public School Employees v. Dayton City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Alben v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by350 opinions
- Helton v. Scioto County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- State ex rel. Grady v. State Emp. Relations Bd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. St. Elizabeth Medical CenterOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Peterson v. Buckeye Steel CasingsOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Powell v. Grant Med. Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
345 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.