Legal Opinion

Helton v. Scioto County Board of Commissioners

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 1997No. 97CA2486PublishedCited by 160 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harsha, Judge.

David Helton et al. appeal a summary judgment in favor of the appellee, Scioto County Board of Commissioners. The appellants assert the following five assignments of error:

Assignment of Error No. 1

“The trial court erred in granting summary judgment for defendant-appellee against plaintiffs-appellants.”

Assignment of Error No. 2

“The trial court erred in ruling as a matter of law that the County’s liability depends [solely] on the [duty of care] imposed upon it by Chapter 2744 of the Ohio Revised Code, without consideration of and ignoring the County’s admitted and statutory duty…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State ex rel. Grady v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Coventry Township v. EckerOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by160 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. HennessOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Peterson v. Buckeye Steel CasingsOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Abrams v. WorthingtonOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Dice v. White Family Companies, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Samadder v. DMF of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003

155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API