Legal Opinion
Gould, Inc., (86-3649), Plaintiff-Respondent, (86-8327) v. Pechiney Ugine Kuhlmann and Trefimetaux, (86-3649), Defendants-Petitioners, (86-8327)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 27, 1988No. 86-3649, 86-8327PublishedCited by 164 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge.
Defendants-appellants, Pechiney Ugine Kuhlmann (“Pechiney”) and Trefimetaux, appeal the denial of their motion to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff-appellee, Gould, Inc. The motion was predicated upon lack of subject matter and personal jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1330, 1332(a)(2), (4), 1391(f), 1441(d), 1602-1611 (“FSIA”), improper venue, forum non conveniens, and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
Gould, a Delaware corporation, claimed that defendants had engaged in unfair competition;…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by164 opinions
- Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Phoenix Consulting, Inc. v. Republic of AngolaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Foremost-Mckesson, Inc. v. The Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Norma J. Nesbit v. Gears Unlimited, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.