Legal Opinion
Idaho Potato Commission v. M & M Produce Farms & Sales
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 22, 1999No. 97 Civ. 8125(CLB)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
BRIEANT, District Judge.
Presently before the Court in these consolidated cases is the motion of the Idaho Potato Commission (the “IPC”) (doc. no. 122), brought pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(l)(3) and (6), to dismiss the counterclaims of M & M Produce Farms et ah, (“M & M”) and Majestic Produce Corp. et ah, (“Majestic”) on grounds of, inter alia, Eleventh Amendment Sovereign Immunity. Also before the Court are the motions of the IPC, brought on similar grounds, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(l)(3) and (6), to dismiss the complaint of the intervenor, G & T Terminal Packaging…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Regents of University of California v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- The State of Idaho Potato Commission v. G & T Terminal Packaging, Inc., the State of Idaho Potato Commission v. G & T Terminal Packaging, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Lennon v. SeamanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Nevin v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Lieber v. Village of Spring ValleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Idaho Potato Commission v. M & M Produce Farms & SalesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.