Legal Opinion

Meleyco Partnership No. 2 v. City of West St. Paul

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 25, 2016No. A15-775PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge. *

On appeal from summary judgment, appellant Meleyco Partnership No. 2 argues that the district court erred in (1) applying West St. Paul, Minn., Zoning Ordinance (WSPZO) § 37.2(1) (2012) to appellant’s legally nonconforming sign, (2) concluding that tenant Pawn America’s change of use of the property triggered the discontinuance of the sign under WSPZO § 37.7(l)(a)(v) (2012), and (3) concluding that appellant failed to rebut the presumption that appellant abandoned the legally nonconforming sign. We reverse.

FACTS

In this zoning dispute, appellant owns the real property…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Swanson v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Hawkins v. TalbotSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  4. In Re StadsvoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  5. KRUMMENACHER v. City of MinnetonkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aim Dev. (Usa), LLC v. City of SartellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
  2. State v. PriggeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API