Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. Talbot

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 1, 1957No. 36,962PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dell, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs seek to permanently enjoin the operation of a gravel pit located in the village of Coon Rapids on the ground that it is being operated in violation of a village ordinance, and on the further basis that it constitutes a nuisance. The matter was tried by the court without a jury. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for the defendant.

The evidence and the unchallenged findings of fact indicate that the plaintiffs 1 owned and occupied certain dwellings along the Mississippi River. The defendant, Paul Talbot, and his predecessors, who shall hereafter be referred to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Haller Baking Company's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Town of Burlington v. DunnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  3. Defelice v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  4. State Ex Rel. v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Cheswick Borough v. BechmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of MinnetonkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  2. Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. County of Freeborn v. ClaussenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. Town of Wolfeboro v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  5. Moore v. Bridgewater Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API