Legal Opinion

Wareing v. Falk

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 9, 1995No. 1 CA-CV 92-0517PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOCI, Judge.

This appeal presents one issue: under Arizona’s Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act (“UCATA”), may a defendant who has engaged in wilful or wanton misconduct receive the benefit of comparative fault principles, thus reducing the negligent claimant’s recovery?

We hold that because wilful or wanton misconduct is a degree of negligence in Arizona, and because the UCATA defines fault as “negligence in all of its degrees,” the UCATA permits apportionment of fault between a negligent claimant and a wilful or wanton defendant. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Bielski v. SchulzeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Scott v. RizzoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Layton v. RochaArizona Supreme Court · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hutcherson v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Williams v. ThudeArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Lamp v. ReynoldsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. State v. BoxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  5. Stein v. Sonus USA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API