Legal Opinion

Ruckman v. Cubby Drilling, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1998No. 1996-1788PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 81 Ohio St.3d 117.] RUCKMAN, APPELLEE, v. CUBBY DRILLING, INC., APPELLANT. RIGGS, APPELLEE, v. CUBBY DRILLING, INC., APPELLANT. BROSIUS, APPELLEE, v. CUBBY DRILLING, INC., APPELLANT. [Cite as Ruckman v. Cubby Drilling, Inc.,

1998-Ohio-455.] Workers’ compensation—Employee injured in traffic accident during travel from home to remote well drilling site—Determining whether employee is a fixed-situs employee and therefore within the coming-and-going rule— Fixed-situs employee entitled to workers’ compensation benefits for injuries…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Fisher v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Lord v. DaughertyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Ruckman v. Cubby Drilling, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Bralley v. DaughertyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. WellsOhio Supreme Court · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Griffith v. Miamisburg, 08ap-557 (12-16-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Stair v. Mid Ohio Home Health Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Lipps v. Kash, Ca2007-05-060 (6-2-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Wining v. Unique Ventures Group, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Callahan v. Proctor Gamble Co., 1-08-19 (9-29-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API