Legal Opinion

Baker v. Market Street Railway Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 1932No. Docket No. 8030PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBINSON, J., pro tem.

This appeal is taken by the defendant railway corporation from judgment in favor of plaintiffs, Charles IT. Baker and Ethel Baker, his wife. The action is for damages for personal injuries sustained by the wife and special damages suffered by the husband in a street-car accident, the complaint alleging negligence on the part of .the railway corporation in suddenly starting the street-car while Ethel Baker, a debarking passenger, was about to alight at her destination.

The charge of negligence is special, the complaint alleging that on April 24, 1929, while plaintiff Ethel…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tingley v. Times Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Kelley v. Hodge Transportation SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Dawson v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Murray v. United RailroadsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Starkey v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wills v. JJ Newberry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. McBride v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  3. McCullough v. LangerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Rogers v. FoppianoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API