Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Foppiano
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 6, 1937No. Civ. 5743PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The defendants have appealed from a joint and several judgment of $10,000 which was rendered against them in a suit for damages for injuries sustained as a result of negligent operation of an automobile causing it to strike and seriously injure a pedestrian. A separate judgment was rendered against Floyd Foppiano, the driver of the machine, for the total sum of $12,529.
The appellants contend that the judgment of $10,000 which was rendered against Eugene and Anna Foppiano, husband and wife, as owners of the automobile, and as parents of their minor son, Floyd, whose application for a motor…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Olsen v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Kershaw v. TilburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Milburn v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Webster v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Harveld v. MilaniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Martinez v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Wills v. JJ Newberry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Balkwill v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Weddle v. LogesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- People v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.