Legal Opinion

Frosch v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 5, 1938PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

In this action for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff in falling over a tricycle on display in the defendant’s store, these material facts are disclosed by the finding, with such corrections as the defendant is entitled to. Shortly after 4 p.m. on May 23d, 1936, in the defendant’s Hartford store, the plaintiff decided to look at zipper bags which were displayed along with other merchandise, including tricycles, in the sporting goods department. These bags were located on express wagons placed upon horizontal metal supports, protruding from the vertical iron pipes of a display rack…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Maguire v. KieselSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  2. Powers v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  3. Elie v. C. Cowles & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
  4. Mazziotti v. DimartinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  5. Shepard v. New Haven & Northampton Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1877

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Saphir v. NeustadtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Antonofsky v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  4. Schaller v. Roadside Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  5. Crowell v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API