Mazziotti v. Dimartino
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
This action was begun in January, 1914, but the hearing, from which this appeal resulted, was not held till December, 1924. After the plaintiff had produced his evidence and rested his case, the plaintiff moved to amend the complaint by setting out the writing in evidence in place of the one alleged. The court denied the motion. There had been various amendments and substituted pleadings and the case had been pending nearly eleven years. The court’s discretion was properly exercised. Shelinsky v. Foster, 87 Conn. 90, 94, 87 Atl. 35. The court then granted the defendants’ motion for a nonsuit…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Plumb v. GriffinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
- Shelinsky v. FosterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Maguire v. KieselSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Pascucci v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
- Schwager v. BuzanoskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
3Cited by17 opinions
- Antonofsky v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Strimiska v. YatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Kukanskis v. JasutSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Pierce, Butler & Pierce Manufacturing Corp. v. EndersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Reciprocal Exchange v. Altherm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.