KMW Johnson, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
RE, Chief Judge:
The question presented in this case pertains to the proper classification, for customs duty purposes, of certain merchandise imported from Sweden and described on the customs invoice as “remaining parts for dryer section” of a papermaking machine.
The merchandise entered at the port of Chicago in 1977, and was classified by the Customs Service as “[industrial machinery ... for the treatment of materials by a process involving a change of temperature, ... and parts thereof,” under item 661.70 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS), with duty at the rate of 6 per…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. RutherfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Worthington v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brosterhous, Coleman & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- Outer Circle Products v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Zomax Optical Media, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005