Legal Opinion
Morin v. Lemieux
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 29, 1980PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPetebs, J.
The only issue in this case is whether the plaintiff’s action against the defendant alleging common-law negligence is barred by the Workmen’s Compensation Act, General Statutes §31-284 (a). The plaintiff, Daniel Morin, sued the defendant, Andre Lemieux, alleging that he had been personally injured because of the negligent operation of a truck owned by the defendant and operated by one Jean Saucier. The trial court sustained the defendant’s second special defense which claimed that the plaintiff’s injuries arose in the scope of his employment and his claim for damages was therefore barred by…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Kennerson v. Thames Towboat Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Stakonis v. United Advertising CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- McNamara v. Town of HamdenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Lake v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Perille v. Raybestos-Manhattan-Europe, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- King v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Sullivan v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Cleveland v. U.S. Printing Ink, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Panaro v. Electrolux Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.