Cassia Creek Reservoir Co. v. Harper
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Justice.
The issues presented on this appeal are, first, whether the district court properly granted a new trial upon motion by respondent, hereinafter sometimes referred to as the corporation; and second, whether the trial court correctly ruled on appellant’s motion that one-half of the recovery (1/2 of $833.33) sought by the corporation was barred by the statute of limitations. Following is a recitation of the pertinent facts.
Respondent is an Idaho corporation formed for the purpose of constructing and operating dams and water reservoirs in Cassia Creek Valley. The articles of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- McCourtie v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Sanchotena v. Tower Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Say v. HodginIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
- William Thedorf v. Sam LipseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
- Poston v. HollarIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Seppi v. BettyIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Everton v. BlairIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- First Security Bank v. Vander PasMontana Supreme Court · 1991
- Garrett v. NoblesIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Fischer v. FischerIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.