Legal Opinion

Church v. Capital Freight Lines

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 2, 1956No. Civ. 8704PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict in favor of defendants in an action for personal injuries. Plaintiffs’ sole contention is that they were denied their right to a trial before a jury of 12 competent persons in that Norman Sindel, the foreman of the jury, was mentally incompetent at the time of trial.

The record shows that the verdict and judgment were entered on March 5; that on March 16, 11 days thereafter, Sindel’s wife filed her petition to have him declared to be a mentally ill person; and that on March 18 he was declared so to be and was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Estate of PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. People v. GallowayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Shipley v. Permanente Hospital (1954)California Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Mattos v. KirbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. HutchinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Noll v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Frates v. TrederCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Burgermeister v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API