Noll v. Lee
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.
Plaintiff appeals from the judgment entered upon a “nine to three” jury verdict in defendant’s favor. The only assignment of error is that the trial court erred in denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial when it became known, following the receipt of the jury’s verdict, that one of the jurors had taken a copy of the Vehicle Code into the jury room and had read to the other members of the jury certain sections of said code which had not been included in the court’s instructions.
The action was one for damages for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident which occurred on the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Luz v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Kollert v. CundiffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Nelson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. HutchinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- In Re StankewitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. SinegalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- Clemens v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Kirby v. RosellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.