Legal Opinion

Burgermeister v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 27, 1961No. Civ. 18660PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of $10,000 in favor of plaintiff.

Questions Presented

1. Is there evidence of an agreement prior to 1947 ?

2. Did the form of the claim bar recovery on quantum meruit f

3. Were plaintiff’s services continuously performedf

4. Was the reasonable value of the services properly determined ?

5. Alleged error in permitting plaintiff to testify as to events prior to decedent’s death.

Record

Plaintiff, a registered nurse, sued the estate of Elizabeth Petzold, of which the Wells Fargo Bank and Union Trust Company was special administrator, for services rendered decedent, who…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tabata v. MuraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Bergen v. Tulare County Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Leoni v. DelanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Nylund v. MadsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Mitchell v. TowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. George v. Double-D Foods, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Woolley v. SeijoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Mattes v. PinkneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Culver Adjustment Bureau v. Hawkins Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Silbermann v. Shangri-La Construction CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API