Legal Opinion

Frates v. Treder

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1967No. Civ. 29920PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISHOP, J. pro tem. *

Plaintiffs brought this action, February 20,1961, for the damages suffered by each of them in an automobile accident for which the defendant Mary J. Treder was said to be responsible. That defendant propounded a series of interrogatories to each plaintiff in June of 1962. Having received no answer from either plaintiff, on April 28,1965, she filed a notice that she would move for an order striking plaintiff’s complaint and dismissing their action, and for an order for attorney fees for preparing for the motion. The orders were made, one for attorney fees, in the amount of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Forslund v. ForslundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Hunstock v. Estate Development Corp.California Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Crummer v. WhiteheadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Lyydikainen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Church v. Capital Freight LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Deyo v. KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Petersen v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Zakroff v. MayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. Hawes Firearms Co. v. EdwardsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Cornwall v. Santa Monica Dairy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API