Legal Opinion

Strom v. Arcorace

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1947No. 30132PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbel, J.

This is a dispute concerning the location of the boundary line between two lots in the city of Seattle. For convenience, we will refer to the lot now owned by defendants as lot A and the one owned by plaintiffs as lot B. Both of these lots were owned by a common grantor from prior to 1890 until a few years before this controversy arose. This common grantor built a house on lot A, about the year 1890; it stands there today. Sometime prior to 1919, the same owner of both lots built a house on lot B. About 1920, he dug a basement under the house on lot A and put concrete steps and an entrance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Turner v. CreechWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Roe v. WalshWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Windsor v. BourcierWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Newman v. BuzardWashington Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lamm v. McTigheWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Mullally v. ParksWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Atwell v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Levien v. FialaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  5. Pendergrast v. MatichukWashington Supreme Court · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API