Strom v. Arcorace
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAbel, J.
This is a dispute concerning the location of the boundary line between two lots in the city of Seattle. For convenience, we will refer to the lot now owned by defendants as lot A and the one owned by plaintiffs as lot B. Both of these lots were owned by a common grantor from prior to 1890 until a few years before this controversy arose. This common grantor built a house on lot A, about the year 1890; it stands there today. Sometime prior to 1919, the same owner of both lots built a house on lot B. About 1920, he dug a basement under the house on lot A and put concrete steps and an entrance…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Turner v. CreechWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Roe v. WalshWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Windsor v. BourcierWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- Newman v. BuzardWashington Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lamm v. McTigheWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Mullally v. ParksWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Atwell v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Levien v. FialaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Pendergrast v. MatichukWashington Supreme Court · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.