Legal Opinion

Atwell v. Olson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1948No. 30436PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

Defendants prosecute this appeal from a decree quieting title in plaintiffs to a strip of land in block 1, Haller Lake tracts, in King county, Washington.

Did the common grantor of the predecessors in interest of respondents and of appellants establish a dividing line between the portion of land sold by him to his grantee and the portion retained by the grantor, which the common grantor and his grantee agreed was the boundary line between the two properties?

If the foregoing question is answered in the affirmative, is the agreed boundary, so fixed and determined, binding upon the successors in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Turner v. CreechWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Skoog v. SeymourWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Strom v. ArcoraceWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Windsor v. BourcierWashington Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Paurley v. HarrisIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Kay Corporation v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Johnson v. ButlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Pendergrast v. MatichukWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Angell v. HadleyWashington Supreme Court · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API