Legal Opinion

Pendergrast v. Matichuk

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 2016No. 92324-8PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

González, J.

¶1 Leslie Pendergrast and Robert Matichuk bought adjacent lots separated by a solid wooden fence. The fence enclosed a venerable cherry tree on Pendergrast’s lot. For several years, Pendergrast and Matichuk maintained their lots as if the fence was the boundary line between them. Unfortunately, the fence stood several feet from the deed line and, according to the legal description, on Matichuk’s land. The cherry tree stood on the disputed part of Pendergrast’s lot. Instead of suggesting mediation or arbitration or filing a quiet title suit, and over Pendergrast’s strenuous…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In Re Stranger CreekWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State v. BreazealeWashington Supreme Court · 2001

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Porter v. KirkendollWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  2. AURC III, LLC v. Point Ruston Phase II, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2024
  3. In re Recall of FortneyWashington Supreme Court · 2021
  4. State v. MartinezWashington Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Fulle v. KananiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API