Legal Opinion
Amerikohl Mining, Inc., Al Hamilton Contracting and Supply Co., Inc., and Central Pennsylvania Coal Company, Inc. v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 10, 1990No. 89-1522PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Amerikohl Mining, Inc., A1 Hamilton Contracting and Supply Co., Inc. and Central Pennsylvania Coal Company, Inc., (“Amerikohl”) appeal the decision of the United States Claims Court, Nos. 433-88L, 441-88L and 442-88L, dismissing the appellants' consolidated complaints seeking reimbursement for reclamation fees allegedly paid in excess of the statutory requirement under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (“SMCRA”), 30 U.S.C. 1201, et seq. (1977), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Amerikohl Min., Inc. v. United States, 16 Cl.Ct. 623…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mansell v. MansellSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Trailmobile Co. v. WhirlsSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Getty Oil Co. v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Elizabeth Nye Woodard, Miles Cogley Nye, Jr., and the Kendall Company v. Sage Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- United States Ex Rel. Siegel v. ThomanSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Gene A. Folden, Coastal Communications Associates, and Judith A. Longshore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Unr Industries, Inc., Unarco Industries, Inc. And Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. The United States, Keene Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.