Legal Opinion
Consolidation Coal Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 11, 2003No. 03-5019PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Circuit Judge.
Appellants (collectively “the coal producers”) appeal from the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction their complaints seeking damages in the amount of reclamation fees imposed and paid pursuant to the Surface Mining Control and Reclamations Act of 1977 (SMCRA). Consolidation Coal Co. v. United States, 54 Fed.Cl. 14 (2002). Because we conclude that the Court of Federal Claims possesses jurisdiction to hear the coal producers’ complaints under the Tucker Act, we reverse and remand. We do not decide the issue…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Nelson v. Adams USA, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Gould, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- United States v. United States Shoe Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- John R. Sand & Gravel Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Gonzales & Gonzales Bonds & Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Martinez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Nike, Inc. v. Adidas AgCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.