Brooks v. Gaenzle
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Keith Clayton Brooks, Jr., appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellees Steve Gaenzle and Paul Smith — deputies with the El Paso County, Colorado Sheriffs Department — in his civil rights actions against them pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and his state tort action pursuant to Colorado Revised Statute § 13-80-119. 1 The crux of Mr. Brooks’s appeal centers on his argument Deputies Gaenzle and Smith violated his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizure by use of excessive force when they shot him after he fled the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by254 opinions
- Pahls v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Torres v. MadridSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Jones v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Barnett v. Hall, Estill, Hardwick, GableCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Merrifield v. COUNTY COM'RS FOR COUNTY OF SANTA FECourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
249 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.