Legal Opinion

Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 3, 1996No. 19-4094PublishedCited by 236 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.

This appeal arises from a jury verdict entered in a copyright infringement action. Plaintiffs Harold’s Stores, Inc. (“Harold’s”) and CMT Enterprises, Inc. (“CMT”) filed suit against Defendant Dillard Department Stores, Inc. (“Dillard”) 1 alleging that Dillard infringed Harold’s copyrighted fabric designs contained on women’s garments, predominately skirts. Harold’s also asserted that Dillard violated the Oklahoma Antitrust Act and the Oklahoma Unfair Sales Act. A jury returned a verdict for Harold’s on all three claims. Dillard appeals, arguing that federal copyright…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by236 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. City of MooreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. Welch v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Robinson v. City of EdmondCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Lockard v. Pizza Hut, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  5. Hampton v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001

231 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API