Legal Opinion

Gifford v. Provident Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 23, 1932PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROWNOVER, J.. The original bill in this cause Was filed by complainant, Mrs. Gifford, for the purpose of collecting one thousand dollars, the proceeds of an insurance policy on the life of her dead husband, Jesse Owen Gifford, an employee of King, Dobbs & Co., of Chattanooga, payable to her as beneficiary.

The defendant answered and admitted the issuance of the policy, but denied that it was indebted to the complainant in any sum: (1) Because the insured was not an employee of the King, Dobbs & Co., at the undetermined time of his alleged death, according to the terms of the policy. (2)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Knights of Pythias v. SteeleTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Cosmopolitan Life Insurance v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
  3. Harriman & Northeastern Railroad v. McCarttCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. General Motors Corporation v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1960
  2. Phillips v. Newport Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
  3. Finks v. GillumCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
  4. Scott v. AtkinsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
  5. Ballinger v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API