Legal Opinion

Harriman & Northeastern Railroad v. McCartt

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided April 16, 1932PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownoyer, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff, Mc-Cartt, to recover damages for the alleged negligent burning, by the defendant Railroad Company, of a barn and contents, ignited by sparks from one of its engines.

The negligence, averred in the declaration was the improper operation of one of its engines so as to emit large quantities of sparks and the failure to have said engine equipped with the necessary appliances to prevent its emitting sparks that caused the fire.

The case was tried by the judge and a jury. At the conclusion of the proof defendant moved the court for a directed verdict, which…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Odeneal v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Anderson v. MillerTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Knights of Pythias v. SteeleTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Marquet v. Aetna Life Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Nashville Railway & Light Co. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Allen v. MeltonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
  2. Tennessee Cent. Ry. Co. v. McCowan Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
  3. Gifford v. Provident Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932
  4. Lindsey v. FowlerTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Pruitt v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API