Legal Opinion

Ballinger v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1934PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggart

This is an action to recover the value of a contract of life insurance, issued by defendant in 1922 to Luther Ballinger, complainant’s husband. Hearing the case on stipulated facts, the chancellor decreed that complainant had not established her right to recovery, and dismissed the bill. Complainant has appealed.

The bill avers that the insured met his death on or shortly after November 20, 1925, the date of his disappearance, and relies upon the common-law presumption of death after seven years’ unexplained absence to establish the fact of his death; the suit having been begun more than seven…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'n v. MettlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Pacific States Paper Trade Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Davie v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Tisdale v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  5. American Nat. Ins. Co. v. HicksTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cude v. CulbersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
  2. New York Life Ins. v. Nashville Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Pickard v. BerrymanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939
  4. Silcox v. Smith CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
  5. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. MeadeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API