Legal Opinion
Finks v. Gillum
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided August 27, 1954PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHickebson, J.
Bertha Gillum filed her suit to recover damages for personal injuries which she allegedly received when an automobile in which she was riding was struck from the rear by an automobile which was being driven by William E. Finks.
William M. Gillum, husband of Bertha Gillum, brought his suit against William E. Finks to recover the damages which he suffered from the injuries to his wife. The decision in the Bertha Gillum case will control the decision in the husband’s case. If the wife is entitled to recover, the husband is entitled to recover. Wherefore, we shall confine this opinion to the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- International Harvester Co. v. SartainCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
- Frank v. WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
- Wildman Mfg. Co. v. Davenport Hosiery MillsTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
- Osborn v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1945
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Ingram v. EarthmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Coakley v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
- Spence v. Allstate Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- Ellis v. White Freightliner Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1980
- James D. Arms v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.