Legal Opinion
Birdsall v. City of Hartford
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 4, 2003No. CIV.A. 3:01CV565 (SR)PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
UNDERHILL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Bruce Birdsall brings this action seeking damages and other relief for claims of deprivation of rights secured by the Constitution, the laws of the United States and the State of Connecticut. The defendants, the City of Hartford, Joseph Croughwell, the Chief of Police of the City of Hartford, Franco Sanzo, a member of the Hartford Police Department’s Vice and Narcotics Division, and David Kenary, also a member of the Vice and Narcotics Division, have moved for partial summary judgment on the following claims raised in…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Roberts v. BabkiewiczCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Russo v. City Of BridgeportCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Russo v. City of BridgeportCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Green v. BacaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Clynch v. ChapmanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.