Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Sharp

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 15, 1945No. 13030PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The question presented by this appeal is whether the district court had jurisdiction under the Emergency Price Control Act of January 30, 1942, 56 Stat. 23, 50 U.S. C.A.Appendix § 901 et seq., as amended October 2, 1942, 56 Stat. 765, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 961 et seq., to consider the validity of a maximum price regulation promulgated by the Price Administrator.

This action was commenced September 2, 1944, by the Administrator alleging that the appellee Sharp had violated Revised Maximum Price Regulation 341, as amended (8 Fed.Reg. 11176), effective August 16, 1943, establishing maximum prices…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Speten v. BowlesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bowles v. GoebelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  2. Bowles v. AmmonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
  3. Bowles v. Biberman Bros.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
  4. Bowles v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  5. Bowles v. WardDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API