Legal Opinion
Woods v. Mertes
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 21, 1949No. Civ. No. 1040PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODNEY, District Judge.
This is a rent overcharge case in which the plaintiff has moved under Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., for summary judgment upon the complaint, the answer, as amended, and defendant’s answers to plaintiff’s requests for admissions1 and his answers to plaintiff’s interrogatories.2 The motion is supported and opposed by affidavits.
There clearly is no genuine issue as to any material fact with respect to whether or not there was an overcharge of rent by defendant as landlord of certain housing accommodations located within the Delaware Defense Rental…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Biggins v. Oltmer Iron WorksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
- Audi Vision Inc. v. RCA Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Coffman v. Federal Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Bowles v. HastingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Bowles v. KrodelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Reams v. Tulsa Cable Television, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- FMC Corp. v. Vendo Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2002
- Clouser v. Spaniol Ford, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1974
- Wynn v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Interstate Non-Ferrous Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.