Legal Opinion
Bowles v. Franceschini
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 10, 1944No. 3997PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAHONEY, Circuit Judge.
The Administrator of the Office of Price Administration brought this action in the District Court to enjoin the defendants from violating the price regulations promulgated under the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 52 Stat. 23, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix §§ 901-946, hereinafter called the Act, and to recover damages in the sum of $1,461.93, being three times the amount by which the alleged sales prices exceeded those permitted by the regulations.
The defendants are Enrique Franceschini and Octavio Busquet, doing business as partners under the name of “Juan E. Torres & Co.,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bowles v. American Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Brown v. Cummins Distilleries CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1944
- Zwang v. A. & P. Food StoresAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1944
- Bowles v. RockDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1944
3Cited by19 opinions
- Crary v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- Speten v. BowlesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Bowles v. Indianapolis Glove Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- Bowles v. Biberman Bros.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- McRae v. CreedonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.