Legal Opinion

Nash v. Meyer

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1934No. 5945PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

Eespond'ents’ complaint alleges in substance that appellant a physician and surgeon, either knowingly, falsely and unlawfully or negligently and carelessly induced Mrs. Nash to have an abortion performed, as necessary to save her life, when in fact it was not necessary; also, that the operation was negligently performed and that appellant failed and refused to give Mrs. Nash treatment or eare when her consequent condition required it, and asks for damages because of the negligent and/or illegal abortion and, for the loss of her health and probable inability thereafter to have other children,…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Riggs v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Continental Wall Paper Co. v. Louis Voight & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Nash v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Zeigler v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1910

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
  2. Pittman v. SatherIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Miller v. BennettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  4. Arnold v. Splendid BakeryIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Manning v. Bishop of MarquetteMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API