Legal Opinion

Gould v. Nolen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1927No. File No. 6169PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORlARTY, C.

Respondent brought this action to reform a deed. The facts, in so far as. they are material to the issues, are as follows: On the 27th day of April, 1920, and' for some time prior thereto, the appellant J. C. Nolen was the owner of certain lots in the city of Sioux Falls, which lots may be -sufficiently described herein as lots 7 and 8. On said 27th day of April, 1920, J. C. Nolen and wife executed and delivered to the respondent, Margaret G. Gould, a warranty deed conveying to said respondent the east 75 feet of said lots. On March 27, 1922, Nolen and wife made and delivered to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Buntrock v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Richardson v. ShortSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  3. Day v. DyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  4. Heard v. NancolasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  5. Pyne v. KnightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Teutsch v. HvistendahlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  2. D & P Terminal, Inc. v. Western Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1966
  3. Thomas v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API