Heard v. Nancolas
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from FramJdin District Court. — G. D. Thompson, Judge. Action to reform a written contract. The district court dismissed plaintiff’s petition. Plaintiff appeals.—
1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.
On the 5th day of June, 1916, the plaintiff and defendant entered into a written contract for the exchange of certain properties. In this contract the defendant undertook and agreed to convey to the plaintiff, by *1046warranty deed, on or before the 1st day of March, 1917, for a consideration, the adequacy of which is not in controversy here, the east half of the northwest quarter of Section 11-91-21, subject to mortgage incumbrance of $7,500, and to pay plaintiff at said date the sum of $8,700, and further agreed to furnish an abstract showing marketable title free from incumbrance, except any…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hallam v. CorlettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
3Cited by13 opinions
- Merle O. Milligan Co. v. LottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- Allemang v. WhiteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- Hubbard Grain Co. v. Western Grain Dealers Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Stillman v. Slifer Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Hubbard G. Co. v. West. G.D.M.F. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.