Teutsch v. Hvistendahl
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The purchaser of real estate brought this action under SDC 37.06 to reform and specifically enforce his contract. Findings, conclusions and judgment favorable to the vendor resulted. The purchaser has appealed.
The vendor inherited Lots 7, 8 and 9, Block 3, Bigelow’s University Addition to Vermillion, South Dakota. These 50-foot lots front to the south on a street, an alley extends along the east side of Lot 7, and an avenue extends along the west side of Lot 9. A dwelling house located principally on Lot 7 overlaps Lot 8 a distance of 6.7 feet. During the negotiations about to be described…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Russell v. Shell Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- McCay v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Gould v. NolenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- Hughes v. PayneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by12 opinions
- Holley v. MaySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Clark v. BergenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Eggers v. EggersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
- Essington v. BucheleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
- Vermilyea v. BDL Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.